None of this is new. What is new is the internet giving an even voice to everyone. The anonymity of the internet is what causes it to be noise and lies. There are no real world consequences nor is there a mechanism for determining if something is a source of truth, in the data aggregation meaning of that term, not people’s meaningless personal truths.
Not gay but only if you say no homo anytime there is accidental physical contact.
Your refusal to see my point of view on this isn’t the win you think it is.
Yes if the family has children that are the same gender as you and you love them; totally gay.
Being able to cause a stronger than normal hurricane does not mean one is capable of controlling the climate.
Micro vs macro.
Memes like this and the endless defense of them have broken any illusions I had that the left is significantly more intelligent than the right.
It’s a team circle jerk that is aggressively defended because the self pleasure is more important than the messaging.
Is the claim that the left controls the weather patterns.
My point was simply to point out the hypocrisy here. When a climate denier says, it’s cold today so climate change isn’t happening, we mock them for not understanding. This meme is making that same mistake.
Awesome. Now narrow down the mechanism with further research.
Soil is the grave yard of the organic matter of our biological ancestors. When you walk on it you desecrate their memories. Pave the planet!
Yes! Every Step!
Disaster!
Mayhem!
Pandemonium!
Chaos!
Weather isn’t climate.
Cool story. Good job working the crowd.
Clearly none of you have ever hit a deer with a car or known anyone that has. Those accidents can cause serious injuries.
But you are also a humorless bunch which I find extremely humorous.
Nope. I also don’t hunt nor did it ever occur to me to control the deer population by intentionally hitting them with my car. I’m sure there are people who have intentionally hit deer but unlikely with any sort of population control mindset.
The fun part is I totally understand why this seems like a logical connection for you but I would be banned for saying it and you wouldn’t believe me anyway.
Why does one side or the other need to do something with you? Do you need someone to assign you a political stance?
The pet population is controlled in this exact manner. Do you fear it in that context?
I’ll donate $5 to their go-fund-me defense.
Without hunting more deer will get hit. That is a far less humane way to die. Dead deer carcasses attract more animals which will lead to more animals being hit.
If we take the absolute position to reduce all harm, the path would likely lead to the spay and neuter of all wild animals until there are no left to cry over.
How many people in Trump’s cabinet lasted the whole term?
I have no issues with her. And I think she will be a better leader than we’ve had in a while. Possible bette than Obama who seemed too afraid to be bold in his actions.
But the news cycles are all about Trump and I know people who still plan to vote for him and the polls are still awfully close that it could easily swing either way.
I feel like I am stuck in a political demographic where I am the outlier. It sounds like the view might be better from where you stand.
People cry when a deer gets hit? I hope it’s over their wrecked vehicle and not over an animal that is hunted to control its population.
This whole school is about to fall out of a window.