Not to mention how voice assistants can just mishear you. Told google once to put dental floss on my shopping list and it said “got it, I added applesauce.” Good try I guess. Pretty trivial this time, but they expect me to trust that for tasks with financial stakes?

So glad I’m not the only one

That’s what the debating and voting is for, no?

#2: what kind of video games? PvP shooters? Grand strategy? Reflex? Detective games? Story/adventure games? Minesweeper? What about non-grid-based trivia/vocabulary games, or open-ended word games without clues, like Scrabble?

The study says they randomized a subset of the available cognitive games for each game session, could the decreased performance be due to the more sporadic focus on any given skills? Maybe some of the trained skills weren’t especially helpful for memory.

Or maybe the specific cognitive games they used were just bad? The only detail about them in the study was that they “included memory tasks, matching tasks, spatial recognition tasks, and processing speed tasks.” I don’t know if it’s similar stuff, or how fast they let the game difficulty scale in the study, but I’ve tried a couple of those brain trainer apps. They started out trivial and boring and scaled up slowly, and some of them were basically just brute force puzzles. Not particularly mentally strenuous.

I don’t see a control group who did neither of them, either. So are both crosswords and cognitive games good but crosswords are a little better? Or do these cognitive games give just as much benefit as watching Family Guy?

I’m tired of these very specific studies being wildly extrapolated out as “video games bad.” Video games are an extremely diverse medium, it’s like saying reading is bad because you only studied gas station tabloids.

Just from a logistical perspective, holiday cooking in an unfamiliar kitchen sounds like an absolute nightmare, especially with Airbnb where you’re at the mercy of the host for how well equipped it’ll be.

What happened to his hands?

Linen actually doesn’t take to large scale mechanization very well. It causes the fibers to break into shorter pieces more often, which makes the final fabric rougher and less sturdy. Machine-woven linen also tends to be more loosely woven, which is again less sturdy.

Machines certainly helped some amount, but cotton got a way bigger boost from industrialization. That’s why cotton is so much cheaper than linen today, especially high quality linen.

My understanding was that there are three types of rayon. Or have I been had by Big Cellulose?

• Viscose is the one that gets weaker when wet, and uses aggressive chemicals
• Modal gets stronger when wet, but also aggressive chemicals
• Tencel (brand name for lyocell) specifically refers to that closed loop process with less harsh solvents, and also gets stronger when wet

If something just says “Rayon” you can probably assume it’s viscose. Tencel sellers want you to know it’s Tencel.

Regardless, none of the above are good for warmth, so bad replacement for wool no matter which process they use. I do love my Tencel bedsheets though.