• FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I’m being put in a difficult situation here because I’m gonna have to go ahead and defend the American “snowflakes.” When it comes to interpreting the phrase “free elections” I think all democracies or close enough to that (which therefore includes the US) chose to say free means you’re also free not to participate. Except for the Aussies. And while I’m not an American snowflake, I’m still a snowflake because I agree with that interpretation. It wouldn’t just ruffle feathers in the US if mandatory election participation was prescribed. You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it drink. Horse = voter, drink = vote. And I don’t think the Aussie governments of the last two decades have proven to be superior because they’re backed by a larger voter base. Remember the guy who ate raw onions?

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      You don’t actually have to fill out the ballot. You can tell the voting officer that you decline it, you can write profanity on it, or you can vote for your dog.

      It’s a minor civic duty. Much less onerous than jury duty, lol

      • gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        And you should be free to do that by not having to interact with someone

        your options are shite and I refuse them all is a valid vote, why make it harder for someone to choose that than necessary?

        • otp@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          your options are shite and I refuse them all is a valid vote, why make it harder for someone to choose that than necessary?

          The only way that’s communicated is by officially declining the ballot. And I agree with the other commenter that it should be easier to do this.

          By not voting, you’re communicating “They’re all fine; I can’t be assed to pick”.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          18 hours ago

          why make it harder for someone to choose that than necessary?

          Ironically, that’s THE main reason for people not voting.

          I never miss a chance to vote and I don’t advocate for others not to vote, but I understand how some people would balk at overcoming a shitload of hurdles (including but not limited to several hours in lines surrounded by too many people, difficulties getting a valid ID etc) in order to vote for the lesser evil, which is still an evil.

          If you make it easier to vote, including without having to have onerous interactions with people, mandatory voting isn’t such a hassle and neither is voluntary voting.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Agreed. Even though I think voting is the right thing to do, forcing people to vote is an infringement on their freedom and I don’t think it’s justified.

      • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        When I think of the cost of that freedom it doesn’t seem too steep.

        People want all the benefits but none of the responsibility, IMO.

        I definitely see your viewpoint though.