Can’t run Windows 11? Don’t want to? There are surprisingly legal options

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Because I don’t want to run hardware that needs to operate in realtime over a USB 2.0 connection through a VM. I have digital turntables with high-resolution platters. These are precision instruments that require the absolute lowest DPC latency obtainable; I need to eliminate as much overhead as I can, and have my equipment running as close to the bare metal as I can get from a modern OS.

        • Psythik@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Open format, so literally anything and everything. I go entirely by audience reaction when deciding what to play. But mostly I like happy songs with a party vibe.

              • Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 hours ago

                Ooooo yes I would love that. Bookmarked for next time I work. I skipped around and as a lover of EDM, trance, HHC, Dn’B, and all stuff like that, I think what you okay is right up my alley.

      • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not sure if you’re using a desktop or laptop (unclear if you’re doing DJ stuff for mixing privately or gigging on the road), but hardware passthrough through something like SR-IOV would make latency a non-issue.

        However, I get what you’re saying. I was more thinking of the “I want to run this on a legacy operating system for as long as I can” aspect of things. Eliminating the concern of the hardware no longer supporting a more modern operating system was what I was trying to get at. Sorry if that didn’t come through.

    • PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      What would be the point? That’s just staying on Windows, with extra steps and lower performance.

      • bss03@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The VM protects somewhat from network attacks and spread. But, I do imagine most vulnerabilities of Win10 would still be exploitable, and you would be sacrificing some performance, yes.

      • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        They mention their equipment is legacy and only supports Windows 10. An Airgapped VM of Windows 10 is a good option to continue supporting legacy hardware.