• n2burns@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Please point out any. I know there are models that fit European standards instead of North American, but they aren’t arbitrarily banned because “they look scary.”

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Well not, I assumed you were not literally meaning they are banned because they “look scary”… I assumed a more rational interpretation like they “do not meet safety standards and/or do not meet environmental standards”

      I will not find examples to fit your strawman

      • n2burns@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It’s not a strawman. I am all for gun safety, but the rifles that have been recently “prohibited” are simply models that “look scary” while their sporterized counterparts have had their classification unchanged.

        • Jhex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Ok I guess it’s time to be pedantic.

          Please show me the part of the legislation that says the weapons are banned due to the fear their appearance may induce.

          Or, are you willing to admit this is just your interpretation of a likely imperfect list the government came up with?