• Comment105@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Yes.

    If you can’t drink milk, don’t drink milk. Drink the coffee without the milk. Or drink water or wine or tea or whatever else they serve.
    When did a lack of little luxury accommodations like these milk substitutes become intolerance?

    Does stocking milk ethically require that you stock alternatives for those who want something like milk, but can’t have it?

      • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nobody is mad except americans telling other cultures how to act.

        The waiter simply refused the order.

        • MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not sure what America has to do with what I said. Don’t try generalizing people, it’s just discriminating for no reason and it doesn’t work.

          I was refering to @FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 's comment being aggressive and upset with the “Putain, non”. It’s just conservative because clearly they know what consumers really want, and it’s not change, right, right?

    • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Exactly. If someone wants or needs to avoid certain products, that’s great. There’s plenty of options. But it’s not a restaurant’s job to cater to every whim. They can’t always have everything.

      I can’t have fish. My brother is allergic to peanuts. So I eat dishes without fish, he eats them without peanuts. I’m not going to ask for the ‘fishless salmon’.