Tea@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 days ago‘An Overwhelmingly Negative And Demoralizing Force’: What It’s Like Working For A Company That’s Forcing AI On Its Developers.aftermath.siteexternal-linkmessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1501arrow-down19cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mltechunionization@programming.devghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonetechnology@lemmy.zipgames@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1492arrow-down1external-link‘An Overwhelmingly Negative And Demoralizing Force’: What It’s Like Working For A Company That’s Forcing AI On Its Developers.aftermath.siteTea@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 days agomessage-square49fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mltechunionization@programming.devghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonetechnology@lemmy.zipgames@sh.itjust.works
minus-squareBeigeAgenda@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·9 days agoSounds about right, I had a positive experience when I told my local LLM to refactor a function and add a single argument. I would not dare letting it loose on a whole source file, because it changes random things giving you more code to review. In my view current LLM’s do a acceptable job with: Adding comments Writing docstrings Writing git commit messages Simple tasks on small pieces of code
Sounds about right, I had a positive experience when I told my local LLM to refactor a function and add a single argument.
I would not dare letting it loose on a whole source file, because it changes random things giving you more code to review.
In my view current LLM’s do a acceptable job with: