If rolled out widely, this would make web browsers and third-party YouTube clients without a DRM license unusable for YouTube playback, download, etc. This would include almost all open-source web browsers and almost all third-party YouTube clients. Archive link to reddit post about this

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      DRM in the video feed would allow encrypted ads in the videos, and effectively break normal ad blockers.

      • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Only if there was no client-side decoration/measurement code/links etc to denote that an ad is playing, which there will always be.

        It’s basically no different from having in-stream ads today.

        • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s very different. It’s not as trivial as you paint it. They can make it as hard as they want to detect.

          • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            I’m not making it out to be trivial, but I am realistic about the matter.

            You can have in-stream ads to make things ‘unblockable’, but only so long as there’s no other side effects. Any side effects can be detected, that’s really just the reality of the matter.