• GolfNovemberUniform@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      How is the definition wrong?

      Their definition is “every opinion different to ours” which in my understanding is ridiculous.

      (My understanding is that it varies a bit between servers)

      That’s true but overall similar views have similar issues.

      • naught101@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Their definition is “every opinion different to ours” which in my understanding is ridiculous.

        That seems like some kind of nonsense you’ve cooked up in your head… I see people arguing about things on mastodon every day.

        • GolfNovemberUniform@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          Nonsense cannot be based on facts, dear internet user, and I have those (in the form of personal experience and witnesses). Also the issues only arise when a member of the side of the political spectrum in question faces a different opinion on a topic that is important to them specifically (that is a part of the double standards issue). If it’s not something that can trigger them, there will be little to no issues (unless the person decides to harass the one with the opposite opinion).

          What differentiates leftists from others is the inability to avoid drama and even illegal actions in such cases (though far right movements might have this issue too).

          All of this makes the lies part obvious - they say they support freedom and inclusivity while openly doing the opposite. Therefore they are fascists in disguise.