Summary

A suspect vandalized and set fire to Teslas at a Las Vegas Collision Center early Tuesday in what police call a “targeted attack.”

The assailant, dressed in black, shot at five vehicles, torched two, and left an undetonated Molotov cocktail. They also spray-painted “Resist” on the building.

Authorities have not confirmed a political motive but noted Elon Musk’s ties to Trump. The FBI is investigating, warning that such acts are federal crimes.

Tesla has faced backlash amid Musk’s government role and far-right politics.

  • elbucho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    The most fucked up part of this is the fact that the FBI is involved. I’m old enough to remember a time when someone vandalizing a few cars in a lot at 3 in the morning when nobody was around would be a local PD issue, and not the fucking FBI. Seems like it was only a couple of months ago… man, time flies.

    Seriously, though - in a normal world, this would be far below the payroll of FBI agents. They would spend their time investigating terrorist organizations or child traffickers and bounce this shit back to LVMPD and tell Tesla to file an insurance claim. Instead, the head of the FBI is the lackey of the president, who owes his position to the billionaire that owns Tesla, and so now the FBI is serving as Elon Musk’s personal private investigators. It’s disgusting.

    • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Well they don’t have to spend their issues on child trafficking anymore because the president supports it and has made extensive use of trafficked children.

      And almost all of the domestic terrorist organizations support the government now, magically.

      They just need something to do now singer crime is “solved” 🙃

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      Those times were 30 years ago as of tomorrow. Since Oklahoma, the FBI has been very interested in domestic political violence and terror.

      • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        14 hours ago

        the FBI has been very interested in domestic political violence and terror

        Not super interested in the right wingers most of the time though

      • elbucho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Actually 30 years ago as of a month and a day from now (April 19th, 1995). Still, there’s a huge fucking difference between a little light arson and parking a van packed full of explosives in front of a federal building. This is property damage, not terrorism.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          15 hours ago

          It’s politically motivated property damage, which is terrorism. It starts with light arson, and when that doesn’t bring down the government, it escalates and before too long there’s a truckload of fertiliser outside the White House because someone doesn’t know when to stop.

          • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            46 minutes ago

            Because someone doesn’t know when to stop? I believe you stop when the government works for the people again, right? Just because you like what’s happening doesn’t mean the patriotic shouldn’t revolt.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I dunno I just see highly motivated consumers that want to kick the tires and light the fires on these bad boys before signing on the dotted line. It’s similar to how those patriotic tourists toured the capital on January 6th, 2021.

          • Rimu@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Property damage can sometimes be considered terrorism, depending on the intent, scale, and impact of the act. Many legal definitions of terrorism include serious destruction of property if it is intended to:

            • Intimidate or coerce a population (e.g., setting fire to critical infrastructure to spread fear).
            • Influence a government or international organization (e.g., bombing government buildings to force political change).
            • Cause widespread disruption (e.g., cyberattacks on essential services).

            Tesla dealerships are not critical infrastructure, government buildings or essential services.

            It’s really a stretch to call this terrorism.

          • elbucho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            15 hours ago

            It’s politically motivated property damage, which is terrorism

            By that metric, you could also claim that defacing a political sign during election season is terrorism. Some terrorist drew a mustache on a billboard of one of the candidates in my district. Should the FBI investigate that, too?

            The problem with your slippery slope argument is that it’s fucking stupid. You have to draw the line somewhere. If the FBI is going to investigate every time someone decides to huck a molotov cocktail at a nazimobile, they’re going to have their hands way too full to track down real crimes.