• Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    17 hours ago

    If you agree that morals are relative and culturally constructed, then you shouldn’t reject differences in morals of others as immoral.

    That’s basically just taking a position where you want to be able to change your mind on what’s “moral”, and expect everyone else to follow your opinion on it.

    • Lasherz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I don’t think acknowledging morals as relative to the culture they exist within exempts decrees of immorality. Relative to their culture, it is. Should they speak from the point of view of a culture that they don’t understand? I personally think it’s a sliding scale where, to the extent it harms other people, it needs to be viewed more objectively just, and where it doesn’t harm, it’s fine being a difference in opinion. The only downside to this is that sometimes you don’t know enough about a topic to know there are victims, and so your prescriptive thoughts can change very quickly about the morality of it. Perspective is important and should always be maximized to avoid this problem.

    • Oni_eyes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I said that some are but it seems cultures share a couple of them in common like not killing without cause. So in that system there are local morals and global/regional morals.