• BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      21 hours ago

      This is why Musk wants to buy OpenAI. He wants biased answers, skewed towards capitalism and authoritarianism, presented as being “scientifically unbiased”. I had a long convo with ChatGPT about rules to limit CEO pay. If Musk had his way I’m sure the model would insist, “This is a very atypical and harmful line of thinking. Limiting CEO pay limits their potential and by extension the earnings of the company. No earnings means no employees.”

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Didn’t the AI that Musk currently owns say there was like an 86% chance Trump was a Russian asset? You’d think the guy would be smart enough to try to train the one he has access to and see if it’s possible before investing another $200 billion in something. But then again, who would even finance that for him now? He’d have to find a really dumb bank or a foreign entity that would fund it to help destroy the U.S.

        How did your last venture go? Well the thing I bought is worth about 20% of what I bought it for… Oh uh… Yeah not sure we want to invest in that.

        • Singletona082@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Assuming he didn’t expressly buy twitter to dismantle it as a credible outlet for whistleblowers while also crowding out leftist voices.

        • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          20 hours ago

          it’s that he likes chatgpt better than grok. he’ll still tweak chatgpt once he has access to it to make it worse, but at the core of what he wants is to own chatgpt and rename it grok

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Yes, as is already happening with police crime prediction AI. In goes data that says there is more violence in black areas, so they have a reason to police those areas more, tension rises and more violence happens. In the end it’s an advanced excuse to harass the people there.

      • Eidolon_Alpha@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Lmfao yeah, right bud. Totally how that works. More police = more crime, because… ‘tensions’.

        This sanctimonius bullshit excuse making is why a 100% objective AI model would destroy leftism: it’s not rooted in reality.

        • Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          I don’t think it’s more crime because more tension. It’s instead a self fulfilling prophecy. Who do you think detects and records crime if not the police? Therefore more police in a area increases the number of crime data points in that area.

        • SabinStargem@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The American police were invented to capture black folks and to guard the elite’s interests, not to safeguard the things that make civilization worth having.

        • PapstJL4U@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          reality has a left bias, becausr it the vetter option - the bias comes from the fact many people are not ass wholes.