• EliasChao@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If I understand correctly, there’s some server usage implicated in the delivering of notifications, so it makes sense that it costs.

      That and the fact that it’s a for-profit company expecting to be paid for their product.

      • mmmmmsoup@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I get why they want to charge money, that’s obvious. But they are charging money for another companies service - that’s not a good business plan. Especially when that other company is one of the largest in the world.

  • Electricdoggo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, question of if they’re safe or not will come down to HOW they did the reverse engineering. If the same engineers that delved into the jailbroken iOS devices are the ones that wrote the code (which seems likely given the prototype came from a single person), they’re going to be in trouble. If they implemented a “clean room” reverse engineering though, then they’re likely safe from being sued over copyright violations. See Wiki