• GingeyBook@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    IMO it’s good that they’re forcing it through messages.

    It appears they are sticking with it and it’s working

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, if they had allowed other developers access to it, that would have been good, and it wouldn’t have been forced.

      As it is, they’re forcing the entire thing into their apps and services only, unless you’re samsung.

      These inflated figures are bullshit

      • GingeyBook@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I agree that opening up an RCS API would be great but I don’t think that’s what the original comment was getting at

        And even if there was an API that 3rd party apps could hook into, I don’t think that would skew the numbers in any meaningful way.

        With something as important as messaging, average consumers (at least in the US) are just going to stick with whichever chat app comes on their phone. They aren’t going to reach out and search for anything else. That’s how we got to this point in the first place and why iMessage is so ubiquitous

        • danhakimi@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree that opening up an RCS API would be great but I don’t think that’s what the original comment was getting at

          I think the original comment was implying that nobody, anywhere, would be using a locked-down Google-controlled messaging client in 2023 if it wasn’t preinstalled on their phones as the main messaging app. This little reaction gimmick doesn’t mean anything towards the end of freeing people from backwards-ass proprietary messaging services that don’t respect our damn privacy or freedom, it’s just another monopoloid trap.