• halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 month ago

      Did it provide any new info? We already knew the battery caught fire, because, the fire. And that’s all the article really mentions.

      The article also fails to give any context to put things into perspective, like good reporting should. Especially when it’s not breaking news. It doesn’t give any sort of context of how many car fires happen in general, or the number of drunk driving fatalities. It doesn’t give any context at all, just creates a rage bait headline. Very successfully I might add.

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          Quite the contrary, because of the fascist running the company. But dipshits like you don’t care.

            • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 month ago

              You claimed I had pride in owning it. A vehicle purchased 6 years ago, when there were no real viable EV alternatives below $80k and well before the current extreme bullshit from Musk, and that I’ve clearly commented already with the opposite attitude.

              It’s not your first incorrect assumption I’m sure. But it’s clear from your attitude in comments that you feel like you’re superior to others and seem to have a black and white view of things when reality is anything but black and white. So go ahead and live in your little fantasy world, at least they know you there.