• theluckyone@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I didn’t miss a damn thing. The governor has a process available to dismiss him. That /\ is the process. Therefore, removing the mayor would not be extra judicial.

    Quit moving the goal posts.

    • RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      edit: mistook you for a different poster

      No one has moved goal posts. Everyone else is saying he should be removed and I have said he should not be removed without a trial. Stop trying to misuse logical flaws as away of not addressing the actual argument.

      • theluckyone@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I’m sorry, I must be blind. Please point out the word “trial” in that section of the New York State Constitution.

        All I see is “… after giving to such officer a copy of the charges against him and an opportunity to be heard in his defense.”

          • theluckyone@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            Be my guest. I’d like to see how many of the words in your “explanation” fail to appear in the quoted section of the NYS Constitution.

            Seems to me if the author meant a trial, they’d have used the word trial.