• barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      It’d be even more if we ever got around to reforming the Common Fisheries Policy to make sense. Same goes for Iceland and the Faroer.

      • CAVOK@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Not really familiar with the CFP on that level. In what way doesn’t it make sense?

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          If Austria wants to fish in Danish waters, they can do so, freely. If Denmark wants to fell Austrian trees or mine Austrian mountains, they can’t.

          Then, aside from that, the quotas are insane: We’re constantly scraping the bottom of the barrel, barely preventing fish from dying out. Allowing stocks to recover even a bit would allow us to pull more out of the waters while simultaneously having the stocks recover even more and increase quotas again until fish again are the abundant resource they once were before literal centuries of overfishing. Would take a couple of years, maybe a handful, of reduced quotas to a complete moratorium, depending on area and species. It’s a thing we can absolutely afford to do: Some reduction in consumption, some increase in imports, some money spent on mothballing ships and people’s jobs for a while, gigantic payoff.