Summary

Polls show a majority blame insurance and pharmaceutical companies for high costs, denied claims, and access issues.

Only 44% rate U.S. health care quality as “good” or “excellent,” a 20-year low.

Support for government intervention is rising, with 62% favoring federal responsibility for universal health care.

Meanwhile, satisfaction with the Affordable Care Act has grown, with 54% approving.

Trump’s unclear health care overhaul plans are entering a polarized environment where Americans remain split on private versus government-run systems.

  • uis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Only 44% rate U.S. health care quality as “good” or “excellent,” a 20-year low.

    It’s quite high. In Russia it’s 39%[1], 28% in lowest income bracket, 59% in highest income bracket and 41% in median-like bracket(sadly, it is not median). And USA citizen in Russia will receive more healthcare, than USA citizen in USA.

    I think, just like Varlamov said about public transport and urban planning, the less people happy with healthcare - the better it will become. Or as it was in his example: in good cities residents say “LMAO, look how shitty my city is, here’s photos”, while in bad cities residents say “this is not shit on streets, this is fecal traditions”. I think it applies to all goverment policies.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    21 hours ago

    this is with them hamstringing the aca during the last trump administration and with the mistake of allowing one company to own multiple sectors of the industry (hostpitals and insurance and pharmacy and manufacture and provider)

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    We want universal healhcare. Those who “suffer” due to lack of income (due to the insurance industry collapse) after it rolls out can talk to a therapist for low to no cost.

    • bluGill@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      43
      ·
      1 day ago

      Some of you want that. Some of us do not want that.

      I want to eliminate company provided healthcare. There may be better programs for me, but if I try to look elsewhere I discover that my company pays more than $1000/month for my insurance and if I go elsewhere I lose that all. As such no other plans can compete with what I get. In turn that means my insurance reports to and cares about my company and not what I think.

      • uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 hours ago

        I want to eliminate company provided healthcare.

        That is what universal healthcare for.

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          You need to go back and read what I said, not make a comment that completely ignores my argument. Yes universal healthcare is for that, but there are other options that I support instead.

          • uis@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            If tou really want go to private clinic, you still can. Even somewhere like Belarus. And private clinic there will be better than private clinic in country without UHC. Guess why.

      • snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        20 hours ago

        So what would happen if you stopped working at this place for whatever reason, or the company itself ceased to exist? Just wondering how that situation would affect things.

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          A big mess. I generally can pay full price to keep the current insurance but now I need to come up with that $1000 per month while I don’t have a job.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        You don’t want universal healthcare but you agree that tying health insurance to a private company is awful.

        So what’s your hangup? You don’t want your taxes to go up? If so, I can assure you it won’t be $12000/year.

        • bluGill@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          24 hours ago

          I want health insurance from a private company of MY choice. I don’t want to choose my job based on what health insurance they provide. Right now nobody reports to me - there is no incentive anywhere for me.

          • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            why do you give a shit about your insurance? its the hospital that matters. insurance is just a middle man and an expensive one at that. best insurance i’ve had is state run.

          • glimse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            23 hours ago

            So that still doesn’t tell me why you don’t want universal healthcare…

            • bluGill@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              22 hours ago

              Because I believe in the free market. But what we means I’m not actually in the market and so the free market isn’t serving me.

                • bluGill@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  Maybe, but generally universal has subsidies and so private cannot compete. Or universal has limits on coverage thus making poor who really need help unable to get good care

  • Gork@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    But… but the main health insurance industry association, AHIP, says that 75% of Americans like their employer provided health insurance! Surely they can’t be wrong!

    /s

    • vonbaronhans@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I mean, I generally do like my employer health insurance, but it’s also genuinely a really good plan that I’ve largely had zero issues or outright denials. (I do sometimes have to get my doctor’s office and insurance to talk to one another appropriately, but that’s just as much on the doctor).

      But I would gladly give up my health insurance for a nationalized healthcare system. Not even a question.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Damn, ABC News, look at you out here dropping such a huge scoop on everybody. You’re a credit to modern journalism ABC News and totally not a bought-and-paid-for corportate psyops firm run by republiQans for shackling the poors.

  • Bronzebeard@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    How could this be?!

    You mean even after Congress slapped a [$35] band-aid on the problem…checks notes…16 years ago, and have only picked away at it since then, they still want more?