• LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I’d say a bit of both. The numbers they showed for it if I remember was that they spent $150m to catch like $100,000 of fares that were skipped. Then throw in 4 people dead and you didn’t do much to help. You just made it more miserable for people travelling.

    With fares making up 23% of your income, and payroll taking up over 30% of expenses… Odds are they could cut the number of guards patrolling tolls, ticket sales people, customer service reps, maintenance workers for all the machines/guard terminals etc by a shit ton and make the transportation free, and offset the costs elsewhere. It would also likely boost the economy of the area, do to people not needing to scrape together a couple dollars to take the train and spending it at businesses they otherwise may normally avoid do to costs or not having that extra few dollars.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Well, I’ll give you an update here as I have boots on the ground:

      They cut back on the amount of cops on the platforms now—but now every single exit door has a private guard (one of those rent a cop companies). So now they’re bringing privatized security into the mix. But there are still cops on the platforms! Just not as many at the door because they’ve hired some security guards to have the same effect an MTA person has, which means they can’t really do shit if you don’t let them stop you.

      So a slightly different way to waste money.

    • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      22 hours ago

      In Ontario, asshole political leader Doug Ford is trying to stop free public transit by paying for transit cops out of the provincial budget. That way no one can make the payment you just made. Can we have the same amount of money to spend on improving public transit? No. The only thing fearless leader Doug Ford fears more than free public transit is good public transit.

      What a bag of dicks. Watch other conservative states and provinces follow his lead!

      https://ottawa.ctvnews.ca/doug-ford-announces-money-for-cops-asylum-seekers-in-ottawa-no-new-transit-funds-1.7098980

      • yonder@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Wait, where in Ontario has free transit? The topic of your article, Ottawa, charges for transit.

        • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 hours ago

          It was floated last election and has made the rounds a few times. This is a pre emptive attack.

          • yonder@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Darn. Free or even just cheaper transit would be pretty cool and might increase ridership. I mean, roads are free to use, so why not transit as well?

            • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Yup that’s what the average person never factors in. Roads are 100% subsidized, so other forms of transit have to compete in the market against a free product. It’s really disturbing the process to get to an ideal efficient state.

              I’m not sure libertarian saying we should pay for roads, I’m just saying if we took all the money spent on transit and transportation (including cost of cars, gas, insurance, roads etc…) and pooled it, and allocated it to see what we could get for that money? I think we’d be living in a futuristic city with a free tram/train within a 5min walk of every house in the city. Most people probably would not buy a car unless they routinely traveled to rural locations.

              Alas, that kind of cost efficiency is only a dream at this point. Conservatives will keep on fighting to allow us to be nickel and dimed by corporations in the name of individual freedom.

              “we should be free to choose the manner in which we’re exploited by the rich”

              … Can we not be exploited by the rich?

              “No that’s socialism”