• atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I mean, sure, but if you block/mute somebody and don’t see, hear, or feel them anymore (which is what the block on lemmy seems to do), when what’s the point of additionally signaling to other users “hey, I blocked you”? It seems like a great way to challenge them to create a new account and immediately antagonize you for blocking them to create the cycle again. And on the fediverse it’s even easier since they can just pick an instance that doesn’t know them.

    • TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      I don’t think the point is to signal to others. It’s to prevent the further mental deterioration from a traumatic event.

      I like Lemmy and the anonymity, but it seems to allow harassers to thrive then.

      • atro_city@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        I don’t think the point is to signal to others

        I don’t think so either, but it is a side-effect if blocking were implemented like on twitter, were it not? Harassers would be aware they are blocked and find new ways to harass. Silent blocking (or the post calls it muting) is there better option, in that case, isn’t it?

      • atro_city@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 minutes ago

        Context: Lemmy still allow people to comment on your posts or comments after you blocked them:

        Yes, they can comment, but the person blocking them doesn’t see it. The blocked person won’t know they are blocked, and the blocker won’t know the blocked person commented. I don’t see how that is bad. In the end, for the blocker, the effect is the same, is it not?