The transfer tunnel, known by the Russian acronym PrK, connects the Zvezda module with a docking port where Soyuz crew and Progress resupply spacecraft attach to the station.

Air has been leaking from the transfer tunnel since September 2019. On several occasions, Russian cosmonauts have repaired the cracks and temporarily reduced the leak rate. In February, the leak rate jumped up again to 2.4 pounds per day, then increased to 3.7 pounds per day in April.

“The Russian position is that the most probable cause of the PrK cracks is high cyclic fatigue caused by micro-vibrations,” Cabana said on November 13. “NASA believes the PrK cracks are likely multi-causal, including pressure and mechanical stress, residual stress, material properties, and environmental exposures.”

Crew members aboard the space station are keeping the hatch leading to the PrK closed when they don’t need to access the Progress cargo freighter docked at the other end of the transfer tunnel. Russian cosmonauts must open the hatch to unpack supplies from the Progress or load trash into the ship for disposal.

As a precaution, Barratt said space station crews are also closing the hatch separating the US and Russian sections of the space station when cosmonauts are working in the PrK.

  • Aermis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Space doesn’t really have a temperature as you need something to be hot or cold! And in the vacuum there isn’t much.

    So just unforgiving vacuum.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      If you really play with definitions you can equate cold to things that are thermal insulators and hot to things that are conductors. By that (very stretched) definition a vacuum is cold. Perfectly cold.

      The stretching: Even if something is like a thousand degrees but it’s a near perfect thermal insulator, it won’t feel that hot when you touch it.

    • Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      My brain just imploded from that realisation and it troubles me.

      I can intellectually reconcile what you said, but my reptilian brain cannot comprehend the phenomenon for whatever reason.

      I instinctively don’t believe that the radiation only is how heat is transferred in the vacuum even though I know that this the case. We always have had 3 (convection, conduction and radiation), and that stumps me.

    • zagaberoo@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Heat transfer by radiation complicates things. We lose the majority of our heat that way, and we’d lose a lot more if every cubic inch of the spaces we inhabit weren’t flooded with thermal radiation from the objects that surround us.

      You can absolutely judge the temperature of a volume, vacuum or not, by its radiation content at any given moment.

      • huquad@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You’re describing a thermal balance. Temperature is a property of matter which doesn’t exist in a perfect vacuum. That said, the space around ISS is far from a perfect vacuum (atomic oxygen sucks). In any case, the typical temperature model starts to breakdown with increasing vacuum.

        • zagaberoo@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Sure, but in any practical sense it is a temperature. It would be silly to say space isn’t cold (or hot depending) from a regular person’s perspective. Thermal balance creates an effective temperature, even if it wouldn’t be described as a temperature within some technical frame of reference.