• Rediphile@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    If I have $250k in shares I can also use that as collateral for a mortgage to buy a house. It would be pretty odd and problematic to be taxed on that like it’s income when it’s not, despite me spending it on a house…because I need to pay it back.

    I agree with the rest though. And definitely would love to see 90% for anyone reporting extremely high incomes.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Obviously, the kinds of unrealized gains that are a problem aren’t $250k that someone uses for collateral on a mortgage for a house they plan to live in. The problems are the millions or billions in unrealized gains that someone might use to get a $10 million loan from the bank that they then use to lobby the government to open up new loopholes in the tax code.

      Taxing wealth and/or unrealized gains is tricky to do right, but not doing it at all is even trickier. If you let the ultra rich just keep getting richer, they’ll continue to use that wealth to control the political process to make themselves richer and more powerful. Obscene levels of wealth inequality and democracy can’t coexist.