• CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      5 days ago

      the issue with giving someone eternal office work as a punishment is that you cant have them fired without ending the eternal office work, and being dead presumably they cant starve to death, so if they just start slacking off and ignoring their “job”, what are you gonna do?

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        5 days ago

        That’s the whole point of Sisyphus. He could stop at literally any time, he could slack off. No one forces him, except by virtue of the fact that there’s nothing else for him to do. That friction between “I don’t want to do this anymore, it’s pointless” and “but doing nothing is more miserable” is one of the biggest absurdities in the myth.

      • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Have you not heard of “fluffy fingers”? Its what HR represenatives do in offices to enslaved employees. It’s when you tie the employee up with handcuffs and ropes, and tickle their feet for their whole lunch break.

        …not that I ever got fired from my job of HR representitive for inappropriate behavior…

    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      At my job I once spend time organizing a shelf then put everything back into the box it came in. For a whole month. Made me reflect on my upbringing on how efficient capitalism is.

  • udon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    5 days ago

    Still looks ripped under that shirt. Let him sit there for a few years and see how that changes!

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 days ago

    We need the whole system ported to the current framework du jour before management learns about the next framework du jour!

  • FanciestPants@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    5 days ago

    Remember that Sisyphus was a monster that killed people that he invited into his court. We are not Sisyphus, and we should not share his punishment.

    • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Prometheus.

      The Romans/Greek gods were as shitty as gods usually are. Sisyphus wasn’t so much punished for his crimes as he was for being a smartass to the gods. Sisyphus literally stopped everyone on Earth from dying, and because Ares the God of War complained that wars were no longer fun because no one died, it was undone. The claim that Sysiphus suffered his punishment because of how he toyed with people’s lives is gaslighting, the gods did that all the time. Sysiphus’ biggest crime was not being another god.

      We do not share his punishment thankfully because gods are fiction. Unfortunately, there’s no shortage of Sysiphuses or enemies of Sysiphuses with the same or more power that would either act the same or worse.

  • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    5 days ago

    My interpretation is ðat Sisyphus eventually succeeds only because eiðer ð boulder or ð mountain weaðered to ð point ðat he could rest it on top wiðout much difficulty

      • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        5 days ago

        Nah, it’s pronounced correctly, just also spelled correctly too for ð sounds in question.

        Unless you’re calling ðat þerapist a te-herapist

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          5 days ago

          So why only the thorns? Why none of the other typological changes in English? Like the great vowel shift and such? Written language is an imperfect tool to represent spoken language, which is an imperfect tool to represent free human thought. Where in this bastardization of a bastardization we call language do you draw your arbitrary line?

          • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            Because if I went as far as I actually wished, I would hear no end of it from the sudden conference of armchair linguists explaining why me typing how I want is wrong and I should stop everyþing and go back to “normal” writing because any alternative deeply offends ðem for not catering enough to ðeir expectation of passivity.

            F Yoṙ Intcrest Ðo…

            • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              5 days ago

              Talk how you want. The only issue I see is that others won’t understand you, but you’re not hurting anyone doing so. Just don’t get upset when others can’t understand you.

              • Ð Greıt Þu̇mpkin@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                4 days ago

                Wel ſı ðæt’ſ ð þıŋ, Uı onlı get mæd æt pıpėl hu ſı muı ruıtıŋ æ læc aut æt mı fṙſt. Uı d yujyuėlı end u̇p blȯkıŋ ðem æftṙ Uı seı muı pıſ.

                spoiler

                Well see ðat’s ð þing, I only get mad at people who see my writing and lash out at me first. I do usually end up blocking ðem after I say my peace.

            • Default_Defect@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              You don’t already? Every single comment I see from you is having the same conversation about why you’re doing this.

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Right, it’s the old English Thorn, which we used for the “th” sound. It got phased out around the invention of the printing press, first being replaced with “y” (the -> ye) and then we just decided to change the spelling entirely. There’s a whole history to it, I can’t do it justice ATM.

        • Spacehooks@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          eiðer ð boulder

          So is this supposed to be pronouced “eiyeer ye boulder”

          Lol Feel like decoding.

          • trxxruraxvr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            The first printing presses were from Germany, and thus didn’t have letters that don’t exist in German. Y was used only because the in the font common at that time it was the letter that looked most like the thorn, it was never pronounced as a y.

          • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 days ago

            Close, it’s a TH not a YE sound. My sick-brained explanation probably confused you hahah. The “ye” you see on old signs is a byproduct of the shift. We phased out the thorn character, and replaced it with a y during that period. So “ye olde tavern” would be pronounced “the old tavern”.

            To use the example you gave, it’d be “either the boulder”.

      • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Aren’t you kinda doing the same thing? What do you add to this conversation? I personally found guy’s commitment to his bit fascinating.