• JayObey711@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    No he’s implying that eating something just because it is “Vegan” is not understanding the point. Vegans usually don’t eat stuff because it’s bad for the environment or because they see animals as equal lifeforms and don’t want to cause them harm. If you don’t eat most animal products because of the environment then you might be ok with eating oysters on occasion. They have a similar co2 footprint as most vegetables. Similarly honey has an even smaller footprint.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      That would make them an environmentalist then.

      Veganism is about reducing the harm our actions cause. You can’t pick and choose pieces of it you like and say you are a vegan.

      • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The point is that you shouldn’t base your decisions on whether or not you can say you are “vegan”. You should base your decisions on your own sense of ethics.

        Whether or not beekeeping harms bees is a matter of debate. If a person believes honey is ethical, that’s their decision. Who gives a fuck if it meet someone else’s standard for a particular label?

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Veganism is an ethical framework. Thats the whole point. Its center piece is to reduce harm to living creatures.

          This seems like a semantics argument, which is pointless. The label vegan is immensely useful to vegans, as shocking as that might be from the outside.