Senior Democrats in US cities are preparing to defend their communities in the event ofĀ Donald Trumpā€™sĀ return to the White House after the former president has repeated threats that he would use presidential powers to seize control of major urban centers.

Trump has proposed deploying the military inside major cities largely run byĀ DemocratsĀ to deal with protesters or to crush criminal gangs. He has threatened to dispatch large numbers of federal immigration agents to carry out mass deportations of undocumented people in so-called ā€œsanctuaryā€ cities.

He also aims to obliterate the progressive criminal justice policies of left-leaning prosecutors.

ā€œIn cities where there has been a complete breakdown of law and order ā€¦ I will not hesitate to send in federal assets including the national guard until safety is restored,ā€ Trump says in the campaign platform for his bid to become the 47th US president,Ā Agenda47.

TrumpĀ provoked uproarĀ earlier this week when he called for US armed forces to be deployed against his political rivals ā€“ ā€œthe enemy withinā€ ā€“ on election day next month. But his plans to use national guard troops and military personnel as a means to attack those he sees as his opponents go much wider than that, spanning entire cities with Democratic leadership.

  • SupraMario@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    Ā·
    3 days ago

    I never understood why itā€™s something that Dems want to hide. There is a pretty damn large portion that want to repeal the 2nd.

    https://time.com/5216782/john-paul-stevens-repeal-second-amendment/

    https://newrepublic.com/article/166628/democrats-repeal-second-amendment-guns

    https://www.congress.gov/bill/103rd-congress/house-joint-resolution/81

    https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/09/opinions/gun-reform-second-amendment-repeal-uvalde-shooting-press/index.html

    https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/repeal-second-amendment-gun-control/

    https://www.amazon.com/Repeal-Second-Amendment-Safer-America/dp/1250244404

    https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulations/national-firearms-act

    https://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a19608552/major-owens-second-amendment-repeal/

    https://www.capitol.hawaii.gov/session2019/bills/SCR42_.pdf

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2022/07/11/jayland-walker-highland-park-uvalde-second-amendment/7809531001/?gnt-cfr=1&gca-cat=p

    Because the poll has somehow vanishedā€¦

    https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/one-in-five-americans-wants-the-second-amendment-to-be-repealed-national-survey-finds/

    In February, for instance, the Economist and YouGov asked Americans whether they supported a repeal of the Second Amendment. Just 21 percent said they favored such a proposal, compared to 60 percent in opposition.

    The poll does, however, show surprisingly robust support for Second Amendment repeal (39 percent) among Democrats (by contrast just 8 percent of Republicans would support a full repeal).

    So can we stop pretending that support to repeal and ban all guns isnā€™t something that is the end goal?

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      Ā·
      3 days ago

      Lmao, throwing the kitchen sink at us and hoping we wonā€™t check the details?

      1. Retired Supreme Court Judge

      2. Opinion article saying Democrats should, by a staff writer

      3. A House Bill from 20 years ago with no co-sponsors, that didnā€™t even make it out of committee.

      4. A Podcasterā€™s opinion article

      5. Opinion article saying Democrats should, by a staff writer

      6. College Professor wrote a book

      7. The law saying you canā€™t have fully automatic weapons, (LMFAO, really? you think thatā€™s a repeal of the second?)

      8. An article about the the representative from number 3, who again, acted alone, admitted he acted without party support, and admitted it was little more than a political stunt. Thank you for giving us the first real evidence that Democrats are not trying to ban guns or repeal the second.

      9. Some state legislators asking for a clarifying amendment. Which, (checks notes), yup completely ignored by the party.

      10. A paywalled opinion piece by a staff writer.

      11. Your Seattle Times article puts those numbers in the correct light, because 39 percent isnā€™t a majority or anywhere near enough to force action on the national level.

      But public-opinion polling shows it would take a lot of persuading to bring the public around to that view. In February, for instance, the Economist and YouGov asked Americans whether they supported a repeal of the Second Amendment. Just 21 percent said they favored such a proposal, compared to 60 percent in opposition.

      So no. The answer is no. Because despite using eleven sources you could not find any evidence the democrats are actually trying to ban all guns. Even if we repealed the second amendment it wouldnā€™t ban all guns, it would just open the opportunity to regulate them.

      I will however say that every time the GOP offers thoughts and prayers over the bodies of children, that number grows and once it reaches a tipping point a ban will be inevitable and there will be no glorious civil war because support will just be that high. If the GOP backed off for even a second and allowed red flag laws and universal background check, and had their state AGs prosecute those laws then there would be less shit for law abiding gun owners to wade through. Which is why 75 percent of Americans support Universal Background Check and Gun Licensing. The country is still willing to work with you, that may not be true in a another decade with a hundred more high profile mass casualty events at schools.

      • SupraMario@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        Ā·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Lmao, throwing the kitchen sink at us and hoping we wonā€™t check the details?

        ? You asked for sources, I provided them and you complainā€¦way to start out.

        1. Retired Supreme Court Judge

        A democrat appointed judge. Guess he doesnā€™t count some how.

        1. Opinion article saying Democrats should, by a staff writer

        Ah yea another Democrat that doesnā€™t countā€¦got it.

        1. A House Bill from 20 years ago with no co-sponsors, that didnā€™t even make it out of committee.

        Soā€¦a bill from a Democratā€¦but doesnā€™t countā€¦this is going to be a trend with you isnā€™t it?

        1. A Podcasterā€™s opinion article

        Another Democrat that doesnā€™t countā€¦

        1. Opinion article saying Democrats should, by a staff writer

        Yep definitely a trendā€¦

        1. College Professor wrote a book

        A democrat got itā€¦ doesnā€™t count

        1. The law saying you canā€™t have fully automatic weapons, (LMFAO, really? you think thatā€™s a repeal of the second?)

        I forgot how death by 1000 cuts doesnā€™t countā€¦you sound like a anti-abortion mouth piece saying abortion can still be had in other states, but itā€™s fine to be banned in red ones.

        1. An article about the the representative from number 3, who again, acted alone, admitted he acted without party support, and admitted it was little more than a political stunt. Thank you for giving us the first real evidence that Democrats are not trying to ban guns or repeal the second.

        Sooo yepā€¦ doesnā€™t count because theyā€™re not true Democrats? I hear this a lot from Republicans when they try and refute pointsā€¦

        1. Some state legislators asking for a clarifying amendment. Which, (checks notes), yup completely ignored by the party.

        Soā€¦(Checks notes) Not a real Democratā€¦got it.

        1. A paywalled opinion piece by a staff writer.

        Another not real democratā€¦man you really think very few people are Democrats.

        1. Your Seattle Times article puts those numbers in the correct light, because 39 percent isnā€™t a majority or anywhere near enough to force action on the national level.

        So 39% arenā€™t real Democrats is what youā€™re saying?

        So no. The answer is no. Because despite using eleven sources you could not find any evidence the democrats are actually trying to ban all guns. Even if we repealed the second amendment it wouldnā€™t ban all guns, it would just open the opportunity to regulate them.

        Got it no real Democratsā€¦

        I will however say that every time the GOP offers thoughts and prayers over the bodies of children, that number grows and once it reaches a tipping point a ban will be inevitable and there will be no glorious civil war because support will just be that high.

        Why are we talking about the shit stains in the GOP?

        If the GOP backed off for even a second and allowed red flag laws and universal background check, and had their state AGs prosecute those laws then there would be less shit for law abiding gun owners to wade through.

        You do realize a good chunk of the GOP supports ERPOs right? But again why are we talking about the GOP? That wasnā€™t your question.

        Which is why 75 percent of Americans support Universal Background Check and Gun Licensing. The country is still willing to work with you, that may not be true in a another decade with a hundred more high profile mass casualty events at schools.

        Weā€™ve had 15 mass shootings in schools since Columbineā€¦ weā€™re going to need to have way more each year to get to 100 in under a decade. UBC requires a registery, but most people are to stupid to know thisā€¦and gun licensing is a joke.

        None of that is going to stop or even dent gun deaths in this country.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          If I have to acknowledge everyone who self identifies as a democrat then you have to acknowledge the Republicans and pro 2A groups are terrorists who should be hunted down and renditioned. After all, weā€™re counting what every single person who self identifies with the group says right? Not their actual platform or actions?

          • SupraMario@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            Ā·
            3 days ago

            If I have to acknowledge everyone who self identifies as a democrat then you have to acknowledge the Republicans and pro 2A groups are terrorists who should be hunted down and renditioned.

            Lol wait wait youā€™re suggesting that people who own guns and are pro2a are terrorists? Lol the fuck is wrong with you.

            After all, weā€™re counting what every single person who self identifies with the group says right? Not their actual platform or actions?

            Lol you literally cannot fathom that there is a good chunk of the Democratic party that would ban all guns if they had the chance lol

            PS suggesting that the repubs are pro2a is hilarious.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              Ā·
              3 days ago

              Oh no not at all, just that there are some. If I have to own a minority position, so do you.

              Or we could converse in good faith and look at what the policy directions actually are.

              • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                Ā·
                2 days ago

                Oh no not at all, just that there are some. If I have to own a minority position, so do you.

                This is the issue, Iā€™m not here defending the repubs, and you should know that. Theyā€™re shit for gun rights, they use it as a wedge issue to get single issue voters to vote for them. Hence why my statement that the dems should drop gun control.

                Or we could converse in good faith and look at what the policy directions actually are.

                Iā€™ve provided you sources, would you like me to show actual laws on the books from dems in deep blue cities/states that are doing the death by 1000 cuts way? They might not be able to repeal the 2nd but theyā€™re damn sure trying to make it impossible to own a firearm.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  Ā·
                  2 days ago

                  Dude if you had a smoking gun weā€™d have seen it by now. All you have is inference and FUD.

                  • SupraMario@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    Ā·
                    2 days ago

                    You sound like every republican out there. ā€œNuh uh, that doesnā€™t countā€ā€¦ thatā€™s what youā€™re doing right now. Completely downplaying that more than a 3rd of democrats want the 2nd repealedā€¦but sure you keep thinking otherwise.