• TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Wouldn’t that be the point of focusing on the interoperability layers and recent investment in Arch?

    it does not remotely get the same kind of battery life as it does in OSX

    Yeah exactly. So you need to invest into finding the fixes to that. Which is what Valve appears to be doing? It might be a fishing expedition or just a virtue signal to the foss world, sure. But they did do the thing.

    And yes on AMD. I did leave that window for myself to crawl out through. I think if the trip down ARM on Arch ends up being a fishing expedition, they flip over to a known quantity for a refresh.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      their investments is into a later for x64 to arm cpu translations, but still does not settle the problem that the gpus on arm based systems still have soo little development into games, which would then limit your options to amd, intel and nvidia based arm designs if you wanted an SOC with existing GPU support already in the environment. the moment you choose to have a tiled approach of mixing cpu and gpu from companies, you sort of instantly throw away the efficiency gains from switching to arm in the first place.

      AMD and intel basically havent pushed out an atm based device yet, and Nvidia notoriously hates doing semi custom designs for clients.

      personally i think youre far more likely to see the arm compatibility layer for basic pcvr games on a theoretical index 2 before a steam deck uses arm.