This should have been done long ago.

  • BertramDitore@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 month ago

    If the Supreme Court lets it stand. Reminder: executive agencies don’t have deference to independently interpret laws like the Clean Drinking Water Act anymore, so this new rule will stand until someone decides to challenge it, and until a court decides they’d rather continue poisoning future generations instead of allowing the experts to do their jobs, which is something SCOTUS would apparently prefer.

    • InverseParallax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 month ago

      Literally EVERY red state will sue to keep those pipes.

      I mean, obviously not all of them, the rich neighborhoods will have their shit fixed quick, but damned if Tennessee will spend good money to fix pipes going to those people.

      • Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        I assume the rich neighborhoods will have already have had their pipes replaced, in which case it would only be those people who are affected. Not that I have anything to back that suspicion up.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Which is why it’s absolutely essential to elect enough Democrats in the Senate to enable court expansion.