I’m having trouble wrapping my head around the scale of the problem of nuclear waste. If we took all the nuclear waste produced in a year and evenly blended it into all gasoline burned in a year would the radiation be deadly? Dangerous? Detectable?
It’s easiest to get numbers for the US.
2 000 000 kg of waste per year
510 000 000 000 Liters of gasoline
Obviously this isn’t a real proposal, although I think it would reduce carbon emissions…
You must log in or register to comment.
The solution to nuclear waste is to recycle it. Won’t happen unless we can drive down the cost of doing so.
Is your proposal basically to burn away nuclear waste? Why is the gasoline important?
Few issues I see:
-
I don’t think such waste can be disposed safety by incineration. Because if it could, we’ve have done so already. It’s probably the go to solution when it comes to waste disposal, apart from just burying it or dumping it in the ocean.
-
The main problem is the safety and handling of such radioactive waste. You do not want it anywhere near people and that’s why it’s isolated. They are highly dangerous. Do you want such a substance sitting in your vehicle, garage, gas station with high traffic, etc? The radioactive substance doesn’t just go away when you add gasoline to it.
-
Even assuming we can get past the safety issues, the said mixture will likely not work in vehicles at all, or would destroy your engine.
-
How would this reduce carbon emissions? You are still burning gasoline except it’s radioactive gasoline.
Is your proposal basically to burn away nuclear waste?
No. It’s to disperse it.
The main problem is the safety and handling of such radioactive waste.
It was very much not meant as a serious proposal.
How would this reduce carbon emissions?
Do you want such a substance sitting in your vehicle, garage, gas station with high traffic, etc
-