BitForged Space
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz to Data is Beautiful@mander.xyzEnglish ·
edit-2
9 months ago

How Old Are Artists Who Score a No. 1 Hit on the Billboard Hot 100?

files.catbox.moe

message-square
20
link
fedilink
93

How Old Are Artists Who Score a No. 1 Hit on the Billboard Hot 100?

files.catbox.moe

Blaze (he/him)@sopuli.xyz to Data is Beautiful@mander.xyzEnglish ·
edit-2
9 months ago
message-square
20
link
fedilink

Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20241003102213/https://old.reddit.com/r/dataisbeautiful/comments/1fui2ji/oc_how_old_are_artists_who_score_a_no_1_hit_on/

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    This isn’t beautiful, it’s borderline unreadable. A stack like this is a very poor choice to show changes in relative proportion over time. A simple XY plot with dots would be better.

    • Pilon23@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Sounds like you just don’t like 100% stacked column charts. This is their primary use case after all. I can’t see how an XY plot would do a better job, wouldn’t there just end up being a ton of overlap, making it hard to discern the differences between the smaller segments? Do you have an example where you think an XY plot represented this type of data better?

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It makes it difficult to make within group comparisons due to the shifting baselines. They are fine for “gee whiz” global impression but simply not appropriate for detailed analysis. And yes, I greatly despise them.

    • HottieAutie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      chill out

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 months ago

    The millennium was clearly when social harmony peaked

  • Twoafros@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 months ago

    What happened in the 70s and 80s for artists in their 20s to lose their dominance so much?

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      ·
      9 months ago

      They turned 30 and kept selling records :-)

      • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 months ago

        Ah the early MTV era, such a good time to be alive for music.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      Someone who was 27 in 1969 was 30 in 1972 and moved into the next age bracket

    • HottieAutie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think it was the baby boomers switching age ranges

  • 10_0@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • moistclump@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    Wonder who the naughts 50+ artists are.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      It was probably some artists from to late 60s doing some kinda comeback

    • SGforce@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Johnny Cash for one.

      • SGforce@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        Johnny Cash for one. Bowie is another.

  • Guy Ingonito@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Its interesting how 50 and over just doesn’t exist during the prime boomer years. They really hated the older generations

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    So your telling me gets a chance?

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Hey, is 2001 the Mm-Bop bump?

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      I think it’s the top of the teen boy/girl group hype?

      • tiramichu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        But then strangely a high proportion of over 50s at the same time!

    • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      Hanson was quite a bit earlier.

Data is Beautiful@mander.xyz

dataisbeautiful@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !dataisbeautiful@mander.xyz

Be respectful

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1 user / day
  • 524 users / week
  • 1.12K users / month
  • 3.42K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 2.36K subscribers
  • 188 Posts
  • 3.23K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • KnowledgeIsPower@mander.xyz
  • Beaver@lemmy.ca
  • WanderingPhoenix@mander.xyz
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org