Socialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months agoWhere third-party candidates have gotten on — or off — the ballot in key swing stateswww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square80fedilinkarrow-up16arrow-down146
arrow-up1-40arrow-down1external-linkWhere third-party candidates have gotten on — or off — the ballot in key swing stateswww.nbcnews.comSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.world to politics @lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square80fedilink
minus-squareSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down10·2 months agoBecause I know I’m not. Are you?
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoYou are according to the definition and I didn’t write that so you’ll have to take it up with the people who did.
minus-squareSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down12·2 months agoI’m not, according to that definition. And I didn’t write it either, so if you disagree take it up with the people who did. Thanks, friend! :)
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 months agoYou are so you must be misunderstanding the definition. You should get clarification from the people who wrote it.
minus-squareSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down13·2 months agoI don’t need clarification, I know I’m not shitposting. You are the one that seems to be having the problem. Are you shitposting?
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·2 months agoYou are shitposting according to the definition and if you don’t realize it I’ve given you directions how you can.
minus-squareSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down13·2 months agoYou are incorrect. According to the definition, I’m not. If ya have a problem with the definition, take it up with the people who created that definition. I didn’t write it. Thanks! :)
minus-squareSocialist Mormon Satanist@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down13·edit-22 months agoLiterally, I’m not. Are you?
Because I know I’m not. Are you?
You are according to the definition and I didn’t write that so you’ll have to take it up with the people who did.
I’m not, according to that definition. And I didn’t write it either, so if you disagree take it up with the people who did. Thanks, friend! :)
You are so you must be misunderstanding the definition.
You should get clarification from the people who wrote it.
I don’t need clarification, I know I’m not shitposting. You are the one that seems to be having the problem. Are you shitposting?
You are shitposting according to the definition and if you don’t realize it I’ve given you directions how you can.
You are incorrect. According to the definition, I’m not. If ya have a problem with the definition, take it up with the people who created that definition. I didn’t write it. Thanks! :)
You literally are.
Literally, I’m not. Are you?