This may sound dumb, but I’ve never read for this man. I’ve always just heard about him on social media but never ventured to read his work. Opinions, please. Should I invest? Feeling like fiction lately. I’ve read so much non-fiction through throughout my life that I think I deserve a couple of fiction books to get busy with for a little while. Thanks in advance

EDIT: Thank you so much to all who answered. I have read and appreciated every single comment. I have decided to start with fairy tale since I ran into the book at Walmart. So giving that a shot to see. Thank you so much

  • Bruncvik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Very slow-burning books, and I almost always lost interest before finishing them. I found The Dark Tower especially tedious. After I couldn’t force myself read it, I got the audiobook version a lnd tried to listen to it three times, but always fell asleep. Ironically, the books I genuinely enjoyed were some of his longest ones: It, and The Stand.

    As Richard Bachman, on the other hand, he wrote loads of entertaining books. It almost seems like in that persona he didn’t give a shit what others thought of his works, and the books ended up eminently readable.

    • Aermis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Funny. I had the same experience. I loved the stand and it but couldn’t get past an hour or 2 of the dark tower.

      • DokPsy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Like Tolkien, his writing style isn’t for everyone. Some are drawn in by the madness and cosmic horror realized, others can’t penetrate the veil and tune out. Then again, that’s what’s great about fiction and story telling. Finding what works best for you.

        • penquin@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’ve read “the hobbit” last month and it was wonderful. I really enjoyed it. Then watched the movie and got really mad how they didn’t follow story. Same thing with “the count of Monte Cristo”, watched the 2000 movie and I wanted to go choke the director of the movie. WTH did they do that for. The whole story was messed up. Lol

          • DokPsy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I never go into a movie expecting them to stay close to the book. To paraphrase Douglas Adams, each medium has it’s own way to tell a story and you can’t compare them equally

            • penquin@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I get it, but the books were so good that the movies made me mad. Especially, the count of Monte cristo. That really got on my nerves. They actually modified the story to tell different events. :/

              • DokPsy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I’m just sad that the middle earth movies didn’t include Tom Bombadil. Yeah, it would have severely interrupted the movie flow but that’s kinda Tom’s whole deal.

                The Hearts in Atlantis movie is wholly different from the book and I really can’t get myself to enjoy the movie even when trying not to compare because the underpinning plot drivers were removed. It would be like doing King’s Insomnia as a movie and not including the little doctors.

                It’s complicated and a difficult tightrope to walk for people who enjoy both book and movie stories