Marques Brownlee, known as MKBHD, faced backlash over his new wallpaper app, Panels, due to its high subscription cost ($49.99/year) and concerns over excessive data permissions.

Brownlee acknowledged user feedback, promising to adjust ad frequency for free users and address privacy concerns, clarifying that the app’s data disclosures were broader than intended.

The app, which offers curated wallpapers and shares profits with artists, aims to improve over time, despite criticisms of its design and monetization approach.

    • TwinTusks
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      Months to get that perfect shade of orange.

      • mamg22@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        And just the effort of painting every one of those pixels one by one, it’s not like we have some magic tool to fill an image with the same color and call it a day.

      • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Perhaps more likely years of work with colour and colour theory preceding a quick output of some content? Why the sarcastic tone?

        • willow@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          The sarcastic tone is likely because of the price. There is something jarring about such a simple product, even if it was made by an artist with a good eye for color, being behind such a large paywall. Most people find this app, even forgetting “Orange,” to be overpriced, myself included. It should be expected for people to use the most extreme examples to point out the absurdity and to laugh at it, especially when it’s being marketed to the public.

          Had this been an app you buy for $10 once, still there would be people like this, but much less. And if it were free, for example, nobody would bat an eye. The outrage is caused by price.

          I’m not invested in this debacle at all, really. I just found your lack of understanding interesting. Not trying to offend you by that.

          • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sure. I definitely do not disagree about the price but I wish you’d made it about that and not the art. Have a good Friday!

    • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      That is a measure of exactly nothing.

      https://www.nme.com/photos/30-minutes-or-less-19-famous-songs-written-at-staggering-speed-1422651

      Your post makes it very clear that you have little experience in the creative world. There is no linear measure of successs or quality. You do a great disservice to those toiling with their creativity by making comments such as this one. We need artists, they are fragile things and should be treated with care.

      I didn’t start this post planning to get hetup but I do feel that taking umbrage to your comment is fair, if not tautological.

      I would encourage you to labour over a still life or wrestle a passable rendition of your favourite guitar riff. Try sing the first phrase of your favourite song in key. Trust me: none of those things are easy.

      If you don’t like “Orange” then just look at something else and hold your tongue.