Now currently I’m not in the workforce, but in the past from my work experience, apprenticeship and temp roles, I’ve always seen ipv4 and not ipv6!

Hell, my ISP seems to exclusively use ipv4 (unless behind nats they’re using ipv6)

Do you think a lot of people stick with the earlier iteration because they have been so familiar with it for a long time?

When you look at a ipv6, it looks menacing with a long string of letters and numbers compared to the more simpler often.

I am aware the IP bucket has gone dry and they gotta bring in a new IP cow with a even bigger bucket, but what do you think? Do you yourself or your firm use ipv4 or 6?

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    We turn it off in our office. It doesn’t benefit us.

    You could also make the argument that ipv4 through NAT is better for privacy since it obfuscate what, and how many devices are connected to where.

    • tunetardis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      When I was first looking into IPv6, people were talking about how you can self-assign an address by simply wrapping an IPv6 address around your MAC address. But that practice seems to have fallen out of favour, and I’m guessing the reason is, as you say, the whole privacy thing? There’s a lot of pushback these days against any tech that makes it easier to fingerprint your connection.

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      IPv6 has privacy addresses, though. Stuff on my network generates a new random address every day and uses that address for outgoing connections, so you can’t really track individual devices inside my network.