• Monkeyhog@lemmy.world
    1·
    1 year ago

    I signed up for Lemmy.world, because not having downvotes is stupid and leads to a shitty community.

    • Andreas@feddit.dk
      1·
      1 year ago

      Ironic that three people downvoted this. But I agree, a “no downvotes” rule is designed to avoid disagreement and conflict, which is impossible on a public forum without extremely restricted expression. If the point is to be always be nice, why not disable open commenting and make users select their replies from a list of canned positive comments. 100% safety and positivity.

      • LurkyMcLurkface@beehaw.orgEnglish
        0·
        1 year ago

        I’m torn on the whole no downvote button thing (I missed that when I signed up), but you can be still nice while having a discussion and disagreeing with people.

        I would argue that the downvote button can lead to exactly what you are describing though, no disagreement or conflict.
        Someone posts a unpopular opinion, a bunch of users downvote it to hell and poof!, no discussion or exchange of ideas. Just out of mind, out of sight.

        • Andreas@feddit.dkEnglish
          1·
          1 year ago

          That’s only true if there is a downvote threshold that automatically hides downvoted comments, which I don’t think Lemmy has implemented. I agree that downvoting can be used to censor and avoid discussion, but the justification for removing downvotes on Beehaw is something like “keeping a positive environment with no negativity from disliking” rather than making sure users have to voice their disagreements and not just smash the blue red arrow like cowards.