Mayor said data was unusable to criminals; researcher proved otherwise.
Case file: https://www.nbc4i.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2024/08/Complaint-240829.pdf
Mayor said data was unusable to criminals; researcher proved otherwise.
Case file: https://www.nbc4i.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2024/08/Complaint-240829.pdf
Fuck off
Fuck off
Fuck off
If you had disclosed that data was exposed, maybe you could argue about what he was doing with the data. Maybe. But you told the public that the data was harmless, and that the information he downloaded was worthless junk, meaning that your position was that he couldn’t do harm by downloading the files. And as far as we know, the only harm he’s done is proving you’re incompetent or a liar.
I have seen a recent trend of legal claims that if data is in the open on the dark web that it isn’t actually “readily available for public consumption.” I hope that eventually gets shut down by a reasonable verdict, but it almost feels like an effort to make using TOR or other privacy tools illegal, not by passing a law but using court rulings to say the only reason to have those is to engage in criminal activities.