Donald Trump is trying to brush off the fact that he shared A.I.-generated images of Taylor Swift endorsing his campaign to his Truth Social account earlier this week, now claiming that he doesn’t know “anything about them.”

  • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    She made a billion by selling tickets to huge venues all over the world where she performed.

    She actually did work to get rich, unlike Bezos, who steals his wealth from his workers.

    I guarantee she exploits people like any other capitalist, but there are different types of billionaires.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      Rowling used to seem like a “good billionaire” too. Then she went all TERF-y.

      Swift may seem cool for now, but let’s not put away the guillotines just yet.

      • finley@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not if you read her work, she didn’t. It was filled with racist tropes.

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        I’m fine with that. The guillotine can always stay our regardless of who it is and.how much we currently like them.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Okay? Everyone seems fine until they don’t seem fine. That’s not unique to billionaires or particularly insightful.

        No one’s canonizing anyone here. Saying there’s a difference between “one of the most popular musicians ever” having a lot of money and “exploitative businessman notable for particularly exploitative working situations” who has two orders of magnitude more isn’t some preening hero worship.