Analysis - Artificial intelligence-enabled cameras on billboards, in bus windshields, on petrol station forecourts and in the checkout at the supermarket - all these are here, or about to be.
Homeopapes are definitely a thing. News agreggators, RSS feeds and customizable news like Reuters, and things like pocket being able to send to ereaders.
Alias phone is not some exciting tech unfortunately. I just have another phone that has a number and email account of its own that get used for signups. It’s on casual prepay and is associated with its own human name and online accounts. It’s kind of like I have an invisible flatmate who likes things like fuel cards and free streaming services.
Hopefully we will soon have glasses you can buy that use AI to block out adds within our vision
Alias phone is not some exciting tech unfortunately. I just have another phone that has a number and email account of its own that get used for signups.
Ah bummer. I use a separate randomized email address when I sign up for things, all forwarded to my main email that stays hidden. But then I go and buy some coffee online, and check my Facebook settings and see the coffee place told Facebook I bouught coffee. How does it know? I have all the blockers in the world, Facebook shouldn’t have known I was there. Then I look at the Facebook record and see that it says they send Facebook the data through Facebook Business tools.
But how do they match it up? My best guess is phone number. I would prefer that I could use random phone numbers for each service that forward texts to my real number, like I have for email.
Yikes, that’s creepy about facebook. I’m not on there much but I remember google once wanted to include something I’d booked in my google calendar (whatever the hell that is) so I never booked through that system again. I hate to think what fb is doing that I can’t see, apparently it even has profiles on people who don’t have accounts with it.
It’s scary how easy it is to track people. They definitely have profiles on people who don’t have accounts. In fact, with the data that whichever coffee place uploaded that let them identify me, facebook has an option that lets you unlink the data. Not delete it. They keep the data and anonymise it so they no longer fall under privacy rules.
Meta has been heavily implicated in a couple of genocides - the A Death Sentence For My Father report gets its title from a heartbreaking example where this doctor who didn’t even have a Facebook account was killed because of it.
But that was passive i.e Meta deliberately ignoring reports and refusing to take genocidal content down. More recently Meta has more actively chosen to “take sides” re the widespread censorship of Palestinian human rights posts.
I worry that this attitude combined with its surveillance powers is probably having a catastrophic effect. It would not surprise me at all to learn Meta is data sharing with war AI (which is already being alleged re Whatsapp).
That’s terrible. We are in this age where technology is advancing faster than regulation, and I hope we sort it out over the next few decades as it will get exponentially worse the longer we make reactive rules.
I agree, but I really hope some of us are at least in a position to sort it out. There’s this concept Surveillance Capitalism that points out how corporations have become more powerful because of it and their interactions with governments.
Even without that, in the US they have had legislative capture for decades (eg they are not allowed easy online taxes like we have because HR Block and TurboTax lobby against it) and NZ is beginning to show signs of it. Peter Thiel owns a surveillance company that develops war AI.
That said historically there are always swings in favour of human rights every now and again so here’s hoping we as a species see sense.
Homeopapes are definitely a thing. News agreggators, RSS feeds and customizable news like Reuters, and things like pocket being able to send to ereaders.
Alias phone is not some exciting tech unfortunately. I just have another phone that has a number and email account of its own that get used for signups. It’s on casual prepay and is associated with its own human name and online accounts. It’s kind of like I have an invisible flatmate who likes things like fuel cards and free streaming services.
If we get that I want the They Live plugin!!
Ah bummer. I use a separate randomized email address when I sign up for things, all forwarded to my main email that stays hidden. But then I go and buy some coffee online, and check my Facebook settings and see the coffee place told Facebook I bouught coffee. How does it know? I have all the blockers in the world, Facebook shouldn’t have known I was there. Then I look at the Facebook record and see that it says they send Facebook the data through Facebook Business tools.
But how do they match it up? My best guess is phone number. I would prefer that I could use random phone numbers for each service that forward texts to my real number, like I have for email.
Haha oh man, might be better not knowing.
Yikes, that’s creepy about facebook. I’m not on there much but I remember google once wanted to include something I’d booked in my google calendar (whatever the hell that is) so I never booked through that system again. I hate to think what fb is doing that I can’t see, apparently it even has profiles on people who don’t have accounts with it.
I wish it were easier to avoid this stuff.
It’s scary how easy it is to track people. They definitely have profiles on people who don’t have accounts. In fact, with the data that whichever coffee place uploaded that let them identify me, facebook has an option that lets you unlink the data. Not delete it. They keep the data and anonymise it so they no longer fall under privacy rules.
What worries me most about non transparency of data is their politics and what is happening to people in conflict zones.
I don’t follow Facebook news. What is happening to people in conflict zones?
Meta has been heavily implicated in a couple of genocides - the A Death Sentence For My Father report gets its title from a heartbreaking example where this doctor who didn’t even have a Facebook account was killed because of it.
But that was passive i.e Meta deliberately ignoring reports and refusing to take genocidal content down. More recently Meta has more actively chosen to “take sides” re the widespread censorship of Palestinian human rights posts.
I worry that this attitude combined with its surveillance powers is probably having a catastrophic effect. It would not surprise me at all to learn Meta is data sharing with war AI (which is already being alleged re Whatsapp).
That’s terrible. We are in this age where technology is advancing faster than regulation, and I hope we sort it out over the next few decades as it will get exponentially worse the longer we make reactive rules.
I agree, but I really hope some of us are at least in a position to sort it out. There’s this concept Surveillance Capitalism that points out how corporations have become more powerful because of it and their interactions with governments.
Even without that, in the US they have had legislative capture for decades (eg they are not allowed easy online taxes like we have because HR Block and TurboTax lobby against it) and NZ is beginning to show signs of it. Peter Thiel owns a surveillance company that develops war AI.
That said historically there are always swings in favour of human rights every now and again so here’s hoping we as a species see sense.