• nucleative@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Giant infrastructure projects are a weakness of democracies. It’s tough to get everyone to agree and pay for huge projects that take long term vision and planning.

    Or you could call it a strength because it’s stable and can’t be changed too fast by one guy with a short term bad idea.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Mainly in the US, though. The automobile lobby successfully undermined many attempts at mass transit infrastructure. And the existing rail network is privatized into oblivion.

      Roosevelt showed that there is a way of tackling infrastructure in the US. Only his approach has a minute slither of what can be framed to be socialist, so it’ll never happen again…

    • I'm back on my BS 🤪@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      see NEOM

      It’s an unbelievably stupid idea that’s really going to happen. The prince of Saudi Arabia knows that their oil economy is going to wither away soon, so he’s trying to make SA appealing to people with money and have them move there. How? By building a city that’s a line 160 km (110 mi) long and 200 m (660 ft) wide…in the middle of fucking nowhere. The whole idea is based on technology that we don’t have and is just terrible city planning. Look into it to get a laugh.

        • Comment105@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          No, you don’t get it.

          It’s blessed by god so it’ll be good no matter what. God is good to his faithful. Lamborghini Akbar.