After 16 years of living in my city, they will finally have city-wide fiber internet. I’m pretty stoked because the fastest internet I could possibly have is a WISP at 50gbps down and 10gbps up. Now I will finally have gigabit but it’s through the city, and I’m wondering if they will be more strict on illegal content download given a possible VPN leak. I know this is highly subjective but I want to understand all the possibilities what could happen.

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    ive been making jokes about ‘fiber to the desktop’ since 1996. funny we still are not quite there are we. so close!

    in my experience, the faster the pipe, the less inspection. its a cost thing… when we were paying 500$/moonth for a 64k pipe (yeah thats right), you bet your ass we’re going to sit on people doin illegal/hogging shit. every bit was expensive. when we updated to 1.54mbps t1 things got slightly more lax, but still, usage mattered, hence DPI, packet shaping and the like. when broadband came people just stopped paying attention.

  • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am indifferent…while I agree that it should be, I think ISPs should be absorbed into the government and made as a service like power/water. I’m sick of the big 2 here raping everyone and acting like it’s our fault that we got raped.

    I refuse to get fiber until resellers are allowed to use the infrastructure that the citizens already paid for but is held by a monopoly.

    • SaltySalamander@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I refuse to get fiber until resellers are allowed to use the infrastructure that the citizens already paid for but is held by a monopoly

      No one cares.