Epstein Documents: Highlights and Name Drops
forum.hackliberty.org
Introduction This is an overview of all recently released Epstein/Ghislaine court documents (as of Jan 6th, 2024) – taking great pains to capture the most relevant details from the original source documents. I did this because obviously the media and news cannot be trusted to be unbiased or even conduct effective document analysis. This is for everyone that wants the specific and relevant details without manually reviewing thousands of pages of court documents (like I’ve done). I hope you fin...

cross-posted from: https://links.hackliberty.org/post/733395

Table of contents

  • Introduction
  • Epstein Search Warrant Foreknowledge
  • Hidden Cameras
  • Epstein Technology Stack
  • Epstein Vehicles / Homes
  • List of Potential Witnesses
  • Consolidated Witness Testimony
  • Alan Dershowitz
  • Prince Andrew (Duke of York)
  • Jean Luc Brunel
  • David Copperfield
  • Emmy Taylor
  • Nadia Mareinkova
  • Sara Kellen (a/k/a Sarah Kensignton or Sarah Vickers)
  • Bill Clinton
  • Donald Trump
  • Leonardo DiCaprio, Cate Blanchett, Bruce Willis
  • Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak
  • Michael Jackson
  • Steven Hawking
  • Glenn Dubin, Prince Andrew, Bill Richardson
  • Marvin Minsky
  • Tom Pritzker
  • Stephen Kaufmann
  • George Mitchell
  • Leslie H. Wexner
  • Al Gore
  • Sarah Ferguson, Patrick Jephson, Robert Kennedy Junior, Frederick Fekkai
  • Max Brockman
  • John Casablancas
  • Adam Perrylang
  • Sandy Berger
  • Igor Zinoviev
  • Andrea Metrovich
  • Clare Hazell
  • Sarah Ransome
  • Kevin Spacey
  • stoned_ape@lemmy.world
    35·
    10 months ago

    Oh John Casablancas, Trump’s homey from the early 90s when they both liked hanging out with underage models via the Look of the Year contest. Same John Casablancas who was a sexual assaulter of those same underage girls and who was begged by his assistant to “stop having sex with underage girls”

    Crazy how Trump surrounds himself with dudes that like to do weird shit with underage girls and weird sex trafficking shit like John Casablancas and Alan Dershowitz and Ralph Shortey and George Nader and the Fanjul bros and Roy Cohn and Epstein and how Trump has ties to AMI/Black Cube, the weird mercenary intelligence company Weinstein used just like Trump did to buy rights to stories and kill them before they could be released to the public

    Teflon Don indeed

    Like, I don’t hang out with pedophile sex trafficking assholes. It’s not hard to just not do that, and the benefit is I’ve never been accused of anything.

    Crazy

  • Wooster@startrek.websiteEnglish
    6·
    10 months ago

    I find it fascinating how there are so many high profile POIs in that list. Like, specifically that they’re high profile and not from the same line of work.

    If you’re working in Hollywood, you’d expect to know stars, but only incidentally politicians. If you’re in DC, the reverse is true.

    • c0mmando@links.hackliberty.orgOP
      13·
      10 months ago

      when I was looking some of these people up, I was surprised how many billionaires came up…

      In the 37th annual Forbes list of the world’s billionaires, the list included 2,640 billionaires with a total net wealth of $12.2 trillion, down 28 members and $500 billion from 2022.

      however, when considering that there are only ~2,600 billionaires in the world, I could see how these ultra rich only associate with each other.

    • PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world
      22·
      10 months ago

      I’m not going to get into too much interpretation of the names on this list until more details come out.

      The way Epstein worked was to court those he saw as socially powerful - scientists, business leaders, politicians, actors - and fete them to create a social network around himself. He might throw a dinner party and say Bill Clinton is coming, and he’s really interested in your ideas about eradicating malaria.” I don’t know if he did so with the intent of feeding his own ego or of increasing his own sphere of influence, wealth, and power, although he obviously did so.

      I also know that with at least a subset of his social network, he engaged in enabling the rape of children, and that this was key to several of those relationships.

      What I’m not certain of at this time is who among his social network were of the dinner party set and who were part of the raping children set. Having spent a lot of time in academia, I honestly believe that it’s entirely possible - I’d even call it probable - that there’s many people of note who would not have heard of Epstein and who would not have harbored a suspicion that they should check out someone looking to introduce them to philanthropists or people in positions of power. I’ve had meals with Nobel laureates and could not have told you anything about anyone else at the table who weren’t previously known to me, and even there the context would be limited to their professional work.

      I think this needs to be investigated fully, and I think that anyone guilty of raping children should have the consequences of their actions. I’m just unwilling to judge an association based on a list of names of a known social crawler whose entire purpose was collecting people.

      I’m simply saying that I’m going to hold off on making assumptions about the nature of their relationship to Epstein without further revelations.

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        4·
        10 months ago

        The problem with waiting for investigations is that rich people have a tendency to evade them, many will only be tried in the court of public opinion.

        • c0mmando@links.hackliberty.orgOP
          2·
          10 months ago

          Rich people can afford to pay lawyers and evade courts; now the rich and powerful have the support from the captured system… which is why Epstein was tipped off to his search warrant.

          • maynarkh@feddit.nl
            2·
            10 months ago

            I guess what I’m saying is that legal and social systems should only be engaged with in good faith if they are shown to be trustworthy and working. If they are flagrantly abused by some, then all is fair.

            For example, democracy is not a great invention because it lets people have a say in who gets to call the shots. People have a say either way. With democracy, it’s just they can do so with votes instead of guillotines.

      • c0mmando@links.hackliberty.orgOP
        1·
        10 months ago

        Some of the names are mentioned only in questioning, others are directly implicated as abusers. The relevant details are in the forum post.