• nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Atheism and agnosticism are not mutually exclusive terms. The first refers to belief and the second one refers to knowledge. It’s perfectly possible not to believe in the existence a given god (belief) and at the same time not know with certainty whether it exists (knowledge).

    • neatchee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve always understood the colloquial meanings in practice today to be that atheism is active disbelief where agnosticism is essentially choosing not to choose (for lack of information).

      I understand your point, linguistically and philosophically, but I don’t really think that’s how most people - even atheists and agnostics - use the terms today.

      • nehal3m@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Maybe. It’s worth defining terms before you discuss. I always try to make it clear I view myself as an agnostic atheist.

    • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Through not choosing, agnostics are atheists. Agnosticism is just a subcategory of atheism, and since it derives from the binary of knowing or not knowing, the only other alternative is gnostic atheism.

      Which itself is pretty irrelevant since it implies knowledge of the nonexistence of divinity, which implies it’s possible to empirically disprove divinity, and since it’s not possible to actually prove a negative, gnostic atheism is impossible. Therefore all atheists are agnostic (and all agnostics are atheists).

      Whether you identify as atheist or agnostic is irrelevant then, since both are shorthands for “agnostic atheist”