I’d say most religious, nonreligious and atheist people are not preaching their religion or opposing others

Most successful religious movements are explicitly evangelical. And it isn’t as though religious debate is uncommon in society.

The number of hard core missionaries and zealots are in the minority, but their success is predicated on a large financial and political base back home.

So every group will have a majority of neutrals and subsets who aren’t.

For any group, you’re going to have a “standard” view which will be the baseline. And you’ll have deviation from that baseline by degrees of orthodoxy or heresy.

But standard doesn’t mean neutral. You can have a predominantly Catholic or Hindu or Taoist community with very staunch beliefs and taboos. You can also have a very segregated religious environment, where Pakistani Muslims and Chinese Buddhists or Afghan Muslims and Soviet Atheists or Chinese Falun Gong and Chinese Confuscians both hold to their views rigidly, while feuding over public policy as a result.

The majority doesn’t have to be neutral. There may not even be a majority, in a significantly pluralist community.

This comic is a deliberate effort to categorise atheists as: all being anti-religion.

A lot of the staumcher atheists I know are people who were raised and then rejected a family/community faith. I don’t think that’s an unfair conclusion, but it ignores the cause (social structures that produce a hard divide between these cohorts).

We’re not all neutral. There’s a lot of intense feeling around religion