• polonius-rex@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      because acknowledging that the native american population has been beaten down by the state repeatedly and for centuries isn’t anti-indigenous? because acknowledging that the native american population is a victim of systemic and at times systematic racism isn’t anti-indigenous?

      unless you would deny that they’ve been beaten down by the state repeatedly and for centuries?

        • polonius-rex@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          4 months ago

          i’m saying they’re not up to the task without significant support from some hypothetical party backing them up

          i don’t know what party you’d put in that position if not the current government, and at that point it seems like we’re back to the start, no?

            • polonius-rex@kbin.run
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              4 months ago

              super weird that the abused aren’t in a position of power, and that the abusers are

              yeah, the party in power is majority white, and yeah that’s because of historic racism, but that doesn’t change the scenario that we’re both looking at

                • polonius-rex@kbin.run
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  what’s your plan for returning power to indigenous people without involving a group that’s currently in power (and therefore predominantly white, since racism exists), without having right wing populists use the power vacuum to seize control?