schalkneethling@programming.dev to Programming@programming.dev · 2 years agoGit Thingsmatklad.github.ioexternal-linkmessage-square7linkfedilinkarrow-up136arrow-down113cross-posted to: git@programming.dev
arrow-up123arrow-down1external-linkGit Thingsmatklad.github.ioschalkneethling@programming.dev to Programming@programming.dev · 2 years agomessage-square7linkfedilinkcross-posted to: git@programming.dev
minus-squarexoggy@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 years ago A better approach is to optimistically merge most changes as soon as not-rocket-science allows it, and then later review the code in situ, in the main branch. I upvoted before reviewing the article in situ, then I had to go back and fix my upvote.
I upvoted before reviewing the article in situ, then I had to go back and fix my upvote.