Google’s carbon emissions soar by 48% due to AI - Climate Action
www.climateaction.org

The leap in emissions is largely due to energy-guzzling data centers and supply chain emissions necessary to power artificial intelligence (AI) systems such as Google’s Gemini and OpenAI’s ChatGPT. The report estimated that in 2023, Google’s data centers alone account for up to 10% of global data center electricity consumption. Their data center electricity and water consumption both increased 17% between 2022 and 2023.

Google released 14.3 million metric tons of carbon dioxide just last year, 13% higher than the year before.

Climate scientists have shown concerns as Big Tech giants such as Google, Amazon and Microsoft continue to invest billons of dollars into AI.

  • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.devEnglish
    619·
    5 months ago

    so that corporations can make a few easier dollars before this whole planet burns in flames?

    Sure. But they do that by providing services. Services like Gmail and (probably for a large part) cloud hosting for other companies, companies whose services you’re probably using as well.

    And honestly, it usually is more economical (Both financially as well as in eco footprint) for those companies to use cloud services that scale based on demand, rather than having a fixed set of servers running for the potential max capacity.

    Don’t get me wrong, increased carbon emissions is bad, but the picture is a bit more nuanced than “Google flip switch, kill animals, get money”.

    The AI hype (talk to your toaster!) will blow over, useful AI will remain and improve, this is just a hurdle along the way.

    • pavnilschanda@lemmy.worldEnglish
      14·
      5 months ago

      The AI hype (talk to your toaster!) will blow over, useful AI will remain and improve, this is just a hurdle along the way.

      I hope so. AI spam causing too much internet noise to the point where we can’t tell which one’s true or not would be one big hurdle.

      • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.devEnglish
        21·
        5 months ago

        Who knows, maybe it’ll teach people to be more skeptical of the things they read online, and actually look for the underlying sources.