• BigFig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    What’s stopping him now from dissolving congress? From sending them all back home and requiring governors send new representatives. This situation is the LITERAL slippery slope Republicans have cried about for decades

    • tea@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The thing is that they would just not dissolve and say he has no power to do so. Biden is immune from prosecution for this, but he doesn’t have power to dissolve congress and would ignore him.

      What he could do is say that congress (or Trump or SCOTUS for that matter) are a threat to the nation and then have them assassinated or imprisoned. Based on this ruling, he’d be immune from prosecution for this act and would effectively dissolve them by force.

      The fact that it almost incentives the president to take the most extreme and authoritarian action is the scariest part of this ruling to me.

          • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            First day of the next Supreme Court term is the first Monday in October, well before election day.

            Let’s have Biden call for a giant mob to show up in Washington and have them raid the place. He can promise to keep the police away, and sign a blanket pardon for all acts.

            See how fast the Congress changes that law.

            • merc@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              What does any of that have to do with presidential immunity? He could have done that at any time if he wanted to, but he doesn’t want to because he deeply believes in the system, and because people wouldn’t do it even if he called for it to happen.

    • snooggums@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Dissolving congress isn’t an executive branch power. Congress can just ignore something like that.

      The president can’t just will that kind of a thing into existence.

      • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        4 months ago

        Having the FBI arrest half of them and hold them indefinitely is within his authority, he just has to argue they’re terrorists. He could say every member of congress who made statements defending the January 6 insurrection is a terrorist and send them to gitmo. He’s more likely to come after the squad though.

        • snooggums@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Every member of congress that was part of the attempt to overthrow rhe election is an insurrectionist and should be detained or in jail by now.

      • xantoxis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        4 months ago

        Shooting a gun is well within the president’s power. If he can shoot a gun with no consequences, Congress doesn’t have the ability to ignore shit.

        • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          4 months ago

          The President is also the ranking member of the military and could use the military to halt the Congress meeting, since he would be immune. It would also mean that they could not impeach or remove him because he is immune, and you cannot charge someone with immunity.