SomeoneElse@lemmy.caM to Murdered by Words@feddit.uk · 3 days agogotdamnfedia.ioimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up1591arrow-down122file-text
arrow-up1569arrow-down1imagegotdamnfedia.ioSomeoneElse@lemmy.caM to Murdered by Words@feddit.uk · 3 days agomessage-square34fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDroggelbecher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down5·3 days agoI wouldn’t say so, and for the same reason they claim water isnt wet i claim water is wet: unless it’s just a single molecule, water touches (and even clings to) water. So water is wet.
minus-squareAkareth@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 days ago What if you have two molecules of H2O that are below 0°C or above 100°C? What if you have two molecules of some other liquid substance that are also polar like H2O?
minus-squareDroggelbecher@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoI’d say that the liquid phase is implied. Nobody is arguing whether a solid is wet. And this is just by feel, but I’d say yes. Wetness is polar liquids sticking to stuff.
I wouldn’t say so, and for the same reason they claim water isnt wet i claim water is wet: unless it’s just a single molecule, water touches (and even clings to) water. So water is wet.
I’d say that the liquid phase is implied. Nobody is arguing whether a solid is wet.
And this is just by feel, but I’d say yes. Wetness is polar liquids sticking to stuff.