• Cryophilia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    It doesn’t really reduce risk much because you’re literally about to take it off anyway in that same space.

    • lennybird@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’m going to take a wild guess that the infectious disease doctor knows better, but by all means please proceed, Mr. Dunning-Kruger.

    • nickiwest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      If I’m in transit on airplanes and in airports for 8 hours and I wear a mask for 7 of those hours, the one hour (or probably less) that I take off my mask to eat a meal doesn’t completely negate the good that wearing a mask does for the rest of the time. I’m still reducing my risk (or the risk I pose to others around me) for 88% of my travel time.

        • limelight79@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          There’s a huge difference between sitting at a table by yourself (or even with a family member) and, say, sitting next to a stranger in an airplane. Walking through the restaurant and keeping the mask on so as not to catch or give anything in passing is sensible. Greater distance means lower risk.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            But he’s about to sit down near those people and take his mask off in like 45 seconds. Then he’ll sit there with his mask off and everyone else in there with masks off for 30 minutes at least. That extra 45 seconds is not really helping anything.