BERLIN, Sept 18 (Reuters) - Germany is likely to generate more than 50% of its power from renewable energy this year but needs to ramp up the speed of its transition towards the end of the decade, Economy Minister Robert Habeck said on Monday.

  • Ertebolle@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Germany of course is the country that recently shut down a bunch of nuclear plants + temporarily (we hope) replaced them with coal.

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because when you close down Nuclear plants and open up Coal plants the end result is that you now have fewer Nuclear plants and more Coal plants, thus a replacement has occurred.

      • Ertebolle@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nuclear output 12.2021: 5599.8 GWh
        Brown coal output 8.2023: 5422.0 GWh
        Black coal output 8.2023: 2049.2 GWh

        So if you, y’know, hadn’t shut down those nuclear plants, you’d be burning 1/4 as much coal as you actually are.

        • teamonkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Brown coal output 12.2021: 10100 GWh Black coal output 12.2021: 5391 GWh

          Of course comparing August 2021 - August 2023 there’s less of a difference, but still a noticeable drop.

          • Ertebolle@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure, but nevertheless they’re burning a lot more coal than they would be if they hadn’t pointlessly shut down their nuclear plants.

            “We were able to grow enough soybeans to replace half of the whale meat we were eating, but we can’t replace the other half yet because even though we have plenty of lentils, we hate lentils and don’t want to eat them anymore”

            • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              pointlessly shut down their nuclear plants

              So you’d rather they instead got another round of fuel rods from the russians? Because afaik swapping out those fuel rods for american designs would not have worked without redesigns of the reactors (not feasible in the time available). Besides, the plants were scheduled to shut down for a while now, some of their safety certifications running out shortly after shutdown due to those plans. Renewing those certifications in time would have been a mammoth task better spent on more renewables.

              There can be a discussion about the order of planned shutdowns here (coal before nuclear) but to argue the plants lifetime should have been emergency extended is pretty delusional. Such a thing was simply not possible given the constraints present.

              • JesseoftheNorth@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                The amount of astroturfing for the nuclear energy lobby is insane. Always the exact same talking points. Every. Single. Time. Anytime a post is made about a country switching to wind or solar energy, these nuclear bros bombard the thread saying the exact same shit. Must be a coincidence…

                • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The truth never changes, sorry that you are so upset the sky is still blue despite your misguided beliefs.