I’ve seen a trend where people move the goalposts on the reasons they’re not able to switch. “If only this program worked I could switch”, but when that program is ported it’ll be a new excuse next. Sooner or later you’ll have to draw a line and say “99% of my stuff works, the 1% that doesn’t can get bent”.
Moving goalposts is a concept that applies to debates. Choosing an operating system shouldn’t be a debate. It’s a personal choice, or sometimes a professional choice. Convincing people who don’t want to be convinced shouldn’t be anyone’s goal.
I didn’t mean my post to be read as trying to convince someone to use Linux, but as someone trying to convince themselves to use Linux. It’s fairly common that people want to switch but have convinced themselves that unless they have their exact same workflow from Windows they won’t be able to.
A real Linux boi would rewrite the program from scratch custom tailored to his personal needs.
I run Arch , by the way.
Until remember patient exists and legally cannot create another copy. Sure you made one yourself but can never release it to the public.
deleted by creator
🍷
Wait, that doesn’t solve your problems? Damn, that sucks. (Get your downvotes ready)
